WK17: (10-8) MV vs. (1-1) DaveDILLY (MV Wins)

[Wuxia]

Regular Battle
Punches due NO DUE DATES
Voting ends on NO DUE DATES

Rebuttal Option

both competitors must agree to it at time of check-in
format is A, B, B, A (A posts first, B drops next, B posts follow-up, A drops final bar)

You have 24hrs from when battle was set to agree on rebuttal battle


You know the rules, if not, refer to the rule thread.

@MV
@daveDILLY

[daveDILLY]

here
good luck

[MV]

check GL

[Wuxia]

DaveDILLY is good to go. He sent his bar in.

[MV]

@MV
i never had the name john dillinger
lol
it was dave dillinger

this aint the Opp that ordered but you can be a stand-in for the torture
i wanted to take a part of a good Dill but i guess discounts if you're quartered

[Wuxia]

mv aka candy man

say his name 3 times in the mirror & you will be exposed to a murderous crime..
but if were mentioning this candyman on multiple accounts its usually followed by 'better luck next time'

[Wuxia]

I have MV here. Dave's was too predictable as far as what to expect, the setup was decent but the payoff wasn't all that interesting. MV was thematically on point. His bar was constructed, fleshed out, and had an okay nameflip that was boosted by the usage of a stronger wp afterwards.

v-MV

[Art.]

think MV had the better overal bar.

it didnt read perfect but after a few times i thought it connected better.

dave had an ok concept flip just wished it would have had a bit more sting to it.

VOTE MV

[Amen]

Dave’s punch wasn’t good and IMO neither was MV but I think he did edge it with an overall better bar conceptually.

MV got it.

[Exalted.]

v- mv

dave was bit too wordy & lost me. also concept just not there all the way.
mv was tighter wording wise, a bit more developed punch.

[Lenox]

Agreed with Saint. Dave imo usually has decent wording but this week wasn’t it unfortunately. wasn’t a big fan of MV’s concept. It was okay I guess.

v/ MV

[Wuxia]

5-0 MV wins